{"id":47674,"date":"2026-02-22T14:55:09","date_gmt":"2026-02-22T14:55:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mertdemirel.com\/services\/%d0%b7%d0%b1%d1%96%d0%bb%d1%8c%d1%88%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%b3%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%86%d1%96%d1%8f-%d1%87%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b0\/"},"modified":"2026-07-23T18:24:28","modified_gmt":"2026-07-23T18:24:28","slug":"%d0%b7%d0%b1%d1%96%d0%bb%d1%8c%d1%88%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%b3%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%86%d1%96%d1%8f-%d1%87%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b0","status":"publish","type":"services","link":"https:\/\/mertdemirel.com\/uk\/services\/%d0%b7%d0%b1%d1%96%d0%bb%d1%8c%d1%88%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%bd%d1%8f-%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%b3%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%bd%d1%82%d0%b0%d1%86%d1%96%d1%8f-%d1%87%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b0\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0417\u0431\u0456\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f (\u0430\u0443\u0433\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f) \u0447\u043e\u043b\u0430"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

What is \u0417\u0431\u0456\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f (\u0430\u0443\u0433\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f) \u0447\u043e\u043b\u0430?<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Facial fat transfer is sometimes described as \u201clong-lasting filler.\u201d That can be true in a broad sense, but it misses the most important point: fat transfer is a biologic graft with variable retention. It is a surgical volume strategy that can restore facial support and soften transitions when planned conservatively.<\/p>

Fat transfer to the face is a procedure in which fat is harvested from donor areas, processed, and injected into selected facial regions to restore volume and improve contour. It is commonly used for temples, cheeks, under-eye transitions in selected anatomy, and other areas where volume loss creates harsh shadowing.<\/p>

The anatomical complexity begins with mechanism. Some faces are primarily deflated. Others are primarily descended. Adding volume to a descended face can create heaviness. This is why fat transfer is often best combined with lifting when descent is dominant, and used more selectively when the face is already full.<\/p>

Distribution is critical. Small amounts placed in correct planes can improve transitions. Overfilling one region creates an obvious result. Individual tissue behavior influences retention and swelling, which is why I avoid fixed-volume promises.<\/p>

It is also important to clarify what facial fat transfer is not. It is not a guarantee of permanent volume in a specific amount. It does not correct skin laxity on its own. It does not guarantee symmetry.<\/p>

Recovery variability should be expected. Swelling and bruising can be significant early. Early fullness is not final fullness. The face refines over weeks to months.<\/p>

Revision logic exists. Under-correction can be addressed with a second session after stabilization. Overcorrection is harder to correct. This is why conservative first-session planning is safer.<\/p>

When properly indicated, fat transfer can restore a more supported facial contour in a quiet way. The best outcomes come from anatomy-led diagnosis, conservative distribution, and realistic expectations.<\/p>

<\/p>

<\/p>

<\/p>

<\/p>

<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\u0417\u0431\u0456\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044f (\u0430\u0443\u0433\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0430\u0446\u0456\u044f) \u0447\u043e\u043b\u0430<\/h6>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
Who is a good candidate for facial fat transfer?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

Good candidates typically have visible volume loss and want a natural, tissue-based restoration. I assess whether the face is deflated, descended, or both. A good candidate accepts that retention varies with individual tissue behavior<\/span> and that results mature over time.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

How is this different from HA fillers?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

Fillers are manufactured gels, often reversible, with predictable short-term behavior. Fat transfer is biologic with variable retention and more downtime. The best choice depends on goals and tolerance for variability.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

How long does it last?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

Some volume can be long-lasting if it survives, but retention is variable. I avoid fixed promises.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

When is fat transfer not the right answer?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

It is not always the right answer when the face is already full, when swelling tendency is high, or when descent is the dominant issue requiring lift.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

How variable is recovery?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

Swelling and bruising vary. Early fullness can be misleading. I avoid fixed timelines because healing depends on individual tissue behavior<\/span>.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

What are the main risks?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

Risks include asymmetry, irregularity, nodules, and under- or over-correction. Conservative planning reduces risk.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

Can it be combined with facelift surgery?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

Yes, often. Combining repositioning and volume restoration can produce a more natural result.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

What if I want more later?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

A second session can be considered after stabilization. Staging is often safer.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

Will it look natural?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

It should when volume is conservative and transitions are respected. Overfilling is the main cause of an obvious result.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>

What should I realistically expect?<\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/h5>

You should expect improved contour and softer shadows, not a different face or perfect symmetry.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>